"My life is brilliant.
My love is pure.
I saw an angel.
Of that I'm sure."
This is a poor way of introducing the narrator as it sets a tone of arrogance and self-confidence not fitting for a good character struggle. Perhaps think of starting with something like, "I never knew my mother."
"She smiled at me on the subway.
She was with another man.
But I won't lose no sleep on that,
'Cause I've got a plan."
Obviously the narrator is a man of low morals, preparing to seduce the love of a rival and steal her from him. This can be seen as either very evil or very chivalrous, depending on what period this piece is set in. Also, I appreciate his resourcefulness, and not complaining about his situation but rather doing something about it.
"You're beautiful. You're beautiful.
You're beautiful, it's true.
I saw you face in a crowded place,
And I don't know what to do,
'Cause I'll never be with you."
Unclear. The narrator said in the previous paragraph that he had "a plan," but now he's confused as to "what to do." Does he have a plan, or not? And who is beautiful? The woman he saw, or the other man? Who does the narrator eventually want to be with?
"Yeah, she caught my eye,
As we walked on by.
She could see from my face that I was,
Fucking high."
This clarifies which character the narrator wants to be with, but why is he suddenly inebriated? If he so wanted to be with this person who he claims is "beautiful," why would he pass her by, or present himself in such an intoxicated way? Reconsider the narrator's sobriety, and his giving up on his previous plan.
"And I don't think that I'll see her again,
But we shared a moment that will last till the end."
Now this story is becoming very confusing. Why will he never see her again? He had a plan in the beginning of the story, was his plan to get high and not act on his feelings? If so, this is going to turn out like a Candace Bushnell novel, and I don't think that's a wise choice. Reconsider the climax of the story and include a more reasonable solution to the narrator's problem.
"You're beautiful. You're beautiful.
You're beautiful, it's true."
I appreciate restating the narrator's greatest statement for emphasis, but it seems repetitive. Perhaps restating his mission only once is more appropriate.
"There must be an angel with a smile on her face,
When she thought up that I should be with you.
But it's time to face the truth,
I will never be with you."
This story is obviously a statement about man defeating the will of God. I don't think "the subway" is the strongest metaphor possible, but it is a good alternative to the landscape of Pilgrim's Progress or The Crucible. The urban backdrop lends to the frailty of the human existence, and emphasizes man's need for deliverance from making his own decisions. I think it would be a better idea to start the story with a stronger focus on God's sovereignty, and less focus on what a huge fucking whiny pussy the narrator is.